People just don’t get Darwin
Did you know that evolution is a lie? Did you know that all Darwin did was put a monkey skull onto a human skeleton as ‘proof’ for his ‘theory’? Well neither did I. Until my sister Heather (yes another post inspired by her) let me know this tidbit of ‘information’ which was passed onto her by a Jehovah’s Witness co-worker. This unfortunately is not a one off crazy idea. I’ve since heard this or something similar several times from people belonging to several denominations.
It’s been several months since I last heard about the Darwin monkey skull/human skeleton theory however and I haven’t really thought about. But it came to mind again yesterday when I learned it was the 63rd anniversary of the Scopes monkey trial. Thinking about it again I realised how little people know about Darwin and the theory of evolution. The common belief is that Darwin created the theory of evolution which explains the origin of life on earth and that man evolved from monkeys and that there is no God. This irks me in a bad way for one simple reason. The theory of evolution states none of those things.
Here are the actual facts. Darwin did create the theory of evolution which states that higher forms of life develop out of lower forms of life through random mutation and natural selection. Essentially when an animal is born with good characteristics it is more likely to survive and have offspring thus passing on those good characteristic. When an animal born with bad or ‘less good’ characteristics they are then less likely to survive and pass on those characteristics. Eventually the bad or ‘less good’ characteristics are eliminated from the species. What does that say about the origin of life on earth? It doesn’t say anything about it. Evolution simply explains how life developed into the way we see it today and not how life began. The origin of life is a completely separate theory called Abiogenesis which Darwin had nothing to do with.
As for man evolving from monkeys that is false as well. Man shares a common ancestor with monkeys and didn’t come from them. It’s easiest if you think about it like a family tree. You and your cousin are related (like humans and monkeys) but you did not ‘come’ from your cousin (just like man didn’t ‘come’ from monkeys). Rather you share a common ancestor in the form of your grandparents (just like humans and monkeys back in the Miocene period more than 20 million years ago link). Darwin didn’t state anything about human development in his theory or his book “On the Origin of Species”. Granted he was well aware of the implications (though they weren’t proven for many years) but since he never wrote or stated anything about monkeys and man we can put the lie to the idea that Darwin put a monkey skull on a human skeleton and claimed proof of his theory.
Lastly the theory of evolution doesn’t say anything about denying God. In fact many modern religious people now believe in what is called Theistic Evolution. Basically God used evolution to create life as it is today as part of his divine plan. A religious friend of mine once said “God isn’t magic. He uses nature to perform his will”. So Darwin and evolution does not deny the existence of God.
Darwin, in fact, doesn’t even mention God in “The Origin of Species” or his theory of evolution. But maybe that’s the problem.

Theists need a person to focus on. That’s why they call evolution “Darwinism” (even though it isn’t and atheists are getting almighty bored with it). It’s why they can’t let go of the idea of a Santa Claus in the sky. It’s too scary to NOT have it there.
No one ever has answered where the original “stuff” came from that began this place.
Also keep in mind Adolph Hitler was a very, very successful Darwinist! That didn’t seem to work out so well.
Hi Mssc54,
As the article states Evolution does not deal with the origin of life. Abogenesis is the term you ought to research for information on this matter.
As to your other comment, Hitler was not a successful Darwinist. Darwin’s theory of Evolution explains what happens when genes reproduce. It, as is the case with Science, makes no reference to what should happen, or what ought to happen but simply to what DOES happen.
Hitler’s actions were plainly not anything to do with genes reproducing. Social darwinism is a morally repugnant idea completely unconnected to Darwin and as closely related to Evolution as the Sermon on the Mount was connected to the Spanish Inquision.
However, Darwin in a “nut shell” was “superior will (eventually) overcome inferior.” Adolph Hitler was just doing what he felt was necessary to help the process along.
Mssc54: Aside from having nothing whatever to do with Darwin and invoking Godwin, your posts are in every way completely wrong. Hitler was a practicing Catholic until the time of his death.
Citations:
http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler%27s_religious_beliefs
http://atheism.about.com/od/adolfhitlernazigermany/tp/AdolfHitlerQuotesGodReligion.htm
He was also firmly anti-evolution:
http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/Hitler_and_evolution
Can we now please dispense with the idea that evolution is evil ‘cuz Hilter loved it?
You seem a bit anxious about my (personal) view of Hitler. I just love your “facts” about Hitler. What was his view on the “superior race”?
Having been raised Catholic I clearly remember that murder (remember all those incenerated Jews) is a Mortal sin. According to the Roman Catholic faith a Mortal sin is much worse than a Venial sin. So your claim that Hitler was a “practicing Catholic” is a-kin to a person who is shacking-up with their “significant other” claiming they are a Christian.
Finally I did not say that evolution is evil. I happen to believe that evelution exists even today. I think we just disagree as too where it all began.
Here’s my simple view. In the Bible Genesis 1:1-2 (keeping in mind that I don’t have any “letters” behind my name”. I’m just a regular guy). “In the beginning God creqted the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; adn darkness was uon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon he face of the waters.” Okay now look in verse 2 at the word “was”. “Was” is past tense as if there is this kind of “do over”. Isn’t it at least POSSIBLE that before this “was” time (during the “is” time)… that is when the dinasours and all took place and for whatever reason God decided to “reform” the earth? Isn’t that at least possible?? And if so wouldn’t that kind of “jell” the two sides of evolution/creation?
Like I said I’m just a regular guy. I’m sure you have way much more education than I but that’s where I’ve landed (for now). My understanding of most things (including spiritual matters) is ever evolving.
You seem a bit anxious about my (personal) view of Hitler.
No, I just don’t like seeing facts twisted and abused. Or the whole idea of evolution reduced simply because someone decides to put it in direct relation to a madman with an inferiority complex.
Incidentally, putting quotation marks around the word facts doesn’t make them less so. Lots of people who call themselves Catholic don’t live up to the title. I grew up one as well; I found the hypocrisy intolerable and left.
Isn’t it at least POSSIBLE that before this “was” time (during the “is” time)… that is when the dinasours and all took place and for whatever reason God decided to “reform” the earth? Isn’t that at least possible?? And if so wouldn’t that kind of “jell” the two sides of evolution/creation?
No.
Well, fact is, one of is correct. If it’s you I’m still okay. If it’s me you’re not (yet) but there’s stilt time.
Whoo! Finally back on the internets (just moved and it wasn’t hooked up on time)! I can finally participate in my own discussion now.
*leftcoastlibrul* Thanks for the hitler links I do appreciate them. I find it quite tiresome to have hitler trotted out in every evolution discussion and it’s nice to have some sources to lean on. Also I love your analogy of hitler/evolution and sermon on the mount/inquisition.
*mssc54* I appreciate your comments and have to say your evolution/genesis idea struck me as quite clever and interesting. It fits in with theistic evolution like I mentioned. Evolution with God as the root cause. That used to be my belief as a matter of fact (though I didn’t get it to jive with genesis). Also your comment about how Hitler wasn’t really catholic because he knowingly committed sins and people who live together outof wed lock are not *really* christians because they sin begs the question; Wasn’t Jesus supposed to be the only one without sin? Doesn’t even the most devout Christian sin? If every time a person sinned they were no longer considered christian wouldn’t there be no Christians?
Mantred of course, as you say,even the most devout Christian sins. However, it is my firm belief that when we receive Jesus the Christ as our Savior then He lives in/through us. Perhaps it is semantics but the person who is shacking up knows they are doing wrong, the person who beats his wife knows he is doing wrong. They may SAY they are Christian but willfully sinning is my personal beliefe that their mouth is saved and not their heart. Now having said that, it is also my personal belief that when an individual is “saved” it is rare the a “light switch is flipped” and they are automatically and divinely changed. However, they recognise their short comings by conviction of the Holy Spirit and are willing to walk out a new destiny. Those are the true Christians. I like to refer to those as Disciples of Jesus the Christ. The name Christian is used to loosely in these days.